Which Apple has never charged a commission.” That is notĬorrect.
From page 14 of Apple’s motion to stay the injunction:įinally, Epic suggests that “Apple will not receive aĬommission” on “transactions that happen outside the app.
#Disturbed the guy mask how to
You might say, well, wait a minute, if apps are able to use payment processors other than Apple’s IAP, wouldn’t it be complicated and difficult to figure how to account for and collect these fees? Basically, that’s Apple’s argument. The injunction requires only that Apple allow other forms of payment processing, including links to the web - not that they aren’t entitled to monetize the platform by charging a mandatory commission. As noted by several commentators last week, Apple’s motion to stay made clear that they intended to collect their 15–30 percent of purchases made in-app even if forced to comply with the injunction. Prevented Apple from taking a cut of up to 30 percent on those Those companies’ services or subscriptions. Had to start allowing companies to include links within their appsĭirecting customers to outside websites where they can pay for If the appeals court had not ruled, Apple on Thursday would have Reporting for The New York Times, Kellen Browning writes: Have been recognized as procompetitive in this novel technological Platforms employ similar anti-steering provisions (Ex. That injunction - which Epic has no standing to enforce - will Apple’s own lawyers, for example, seem extremely confident, writing in their motion to stay the injunction: Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers’s injunction mandating changes to the App Store seemed to be on shaky legal footing all along.
This isn’t quite “game over”, but I believe it’s close. The stay will remain in effect until the mandate Motion to stay part (i) of paragraph (1) of the permanent Serious questions on the merits of the district court’sĭetermination,” the ruling reads. “Apple has demonstrated, at minimum, that its appeal raises Ruling but puts enforcement on hold until the appeals court canįully hear the case, a process that will likely take months. The stay, issued Wednesday afternoon, does not reverse the earlier
Ruling that the exclusive arrangement is illegal. In-app payments on iOS, despite the district court’s earlier Stay, Apple can maintain its IAP system as the sole source of Of the injunction issued by the lower court. Apple ruling, placing a stay on the enforcement Russell Brandom, reporting for The Verge:Īn appeals court has paused one of the most consequential parts of Appeals Court Grants Apple a Delay on Injunction Mandating Changes to App Store in Epic Case Wednesday, 8 December 2021